检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:熊永明[1]
出 处:《东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年第2期68-74,147,共7页Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)
基 金:国家社科基金项目"器官移植的刑法问题研究"(12BFX053)成果之一
摘 要:现行器官移植刑事立法的合理之处表现在犯罪圈的适度扩大,刑罚配置的合理化,与器官移植法衔接的一体化,刑事政策的宽严相济化。但其也存在设置的功利性、仓促性和应急性、刑事政策的单一化、立法的协调化不够和刑事法网编制不严密的不足。我国器官移植刑事政策需通过强化刑法解释、拓展犯罪种类以及增进刑法与器官移植法律法规的"无缝对接"等方式不断调整。The rationality of the current criminal legislation of organ transplantation can be found in its moderate ex-pansion of the crime circle,rationalization of penalty,coordination with the Organ Transplantation Act,and bal-ance between punishment and leniency. In spite of that,it has the defects of over-simplification of criminal poli-cy,inadequate coordination of legislation and inefficiency of criminal justice system. When adjusting the crimi-nal policy of organ transplantation,we need to improve the interpretation of criminal law,increase the crimetypes,and bring the criminal law into conformity with the regulations of organ transplantation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.148