检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学经济与金融学院,陕西西安710061
出 处:《经济问题》2016年第4期73-78,共6页On Economic Problems
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目"民间资本供应;风险防范及其健康发展研究"(12&ZD071)
摘 要:实证检验了我国新股发行制度改革第三阶段询价机构意见分歧与IPO定价效率的关系,研究发现:在监管部门针对"超募"、"发行市盈率"、"存量股转让"实施的一系列行政干预下,询价机构意见分歧与IPO定价效率之间的关系弱化,询价机制没有发挥应有的市场化定价效力。研究认为,未来完善我国新股发行制度仍应坚实市场化方向,以提升询价机制的定价效率。This paper empirically tests the relationship between the disagreement of institutional investors' bids and IPO pricing efficiency in the third stage of China's IPO mechanism reform. The paper finds that under the administrative intervention aimed at over- financing,P / E ratio and secondary offering,the relationship between the disagreement of institutional investors' bids and IPO pricing efficiency has been weakened,and the enquiry system has not fulfilled its market- oriented pricing function. The results suggest that IPO mechanism reform in the future should adhere to the market- oriented direction,and improve the efficiency of enquiry machanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117