确权与农地流转:理论分歧与研究启示  

Confirmation and Circulation of Rural Land:Theoretical Divergences and Research Revelation

作　　者：胡新艳[1] 杨晓莹[1] 罗锦涛 

机构地区：[1]华南农业大学经济管理学院,广东广州510642

出　　处：《财贸研究》2016年第2期67-74,共8页Finance and Trade Research

基　　金：教育部创新团队滚动支持项目"中国农村基本经营制度"(IRT-14R17);国家自然科学基金重点项目群"农村土地与相关要素市场培育与改革研究"(71333004);国家社会科学基金项目"分工经济;服务外包与农业规模经营方式创新"(14BJY111)

摘　　要：对于确权所引致的农地流转效应,政界学界的舆论期待非常高。但是土地确权一定能促进农地流转吗?基于文献梳理发现,目前学界存在"确权促进农地流转"、"确权不一定促进甚至抑制农地流转"的两派观点。这两派观点背后所对应的分别是产权理论的解释逻辑和行为经济学的解释逻辑,二者在"确权与农地流转"问题上具有不同的解释力及其适用性。由此认为,有必要借鉴两派理论的合理见解与学术贡献,为构建一个直面问题本身的跨学科农地流转研究框架提供新的视野,拓展农地流转问题研究的理论空间。This paper uses the method of induction,comparison and revision,by combing the articles about the relationship betw een confirmation and circulation of rural land,and focusing on tw o view s,one is＂confirmation of land promotes circulation of land＂,the other is＂confirmation of land may not promote even restrain circulation of land＂,to explore property rights theory logic and behavioral psychology logic w hich lead to the tw o view s respectively. The reason w hy the tw o theories have different explanatory and the applicability are compared and analyzed. Therefore,it＇s necessary to think about how to take the reasonable part and academic contribution of the tw o theories to provide a new perspective for building a new framew ork to salve the problem directly and expand the theory space analysis of circulation of rural land.

关 键 词：农地确权 农地流转 产权 禀赋效应 控制权偏好 

分 类 号：F321.1[经济管理—产业经济]