检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江经济职业技术学院,浙江杭州310018 [2]辽宁大学经济学院,辽宁沈阳110036
出 处:《浙江金融》2016年第2期21-24,共4页Zhejiang Finance
摘 要:近年来,随着第三方支付的迅速发展及规模的不断壮大,针对第三方支付的规制政策也不断出台。本文采用kane的金融创新与金融规制博弈理论思想,分析规制政策对第三方支付机构的影响,即分别在不同决策收益的情况下,第三方支付机构和规制当局的不同的策略选择。研究表明,如果政策采取简单地加重违规处罚力度,短期内有效。但是长期看,只是将规制机构的规制概率减少。但如果是加大对规制机构失职的惩处,则规制机构必定选择规制,这就迫使第三方支付机构减少违规的概率。In recent years, with the rapid development and growing scale of the third party payment,the regulation pol-icies are also continuing released. This paper adopts the Kane's Financial Innovation and Regulation Game Theory to ana-lyze the regulation policy impact on third party payment agencies, namely, in the case of different decision-making inter-ests, the third party payment agencies andregulation authorities will choose different strategies. The research shows that ifthe policy simply increases punishment on violations, it's useful in a short time. But in a long time, the regulation authori-ties will reduce the regulatory probabilities. If increasing punishments on the regulatory agencies, the regulation authoritieswill choose regulation which forces the third party payment agencies reducing violation probabilities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222