检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨远志[1] 王星[1] 陈游[1] 范翔宇[1] 韩小妹[2]
机构地区:[1]空军工程大学航空航天工程学院,西安710038 [2]上海航天局802所军代室,上海200090
出 处:《空军工程大学学报(自然科学版)》2016年第2期31-36,共6页Journal of Air Force Engineering University(Natural Science Edition)
基 金:陕西省自然科学基金(2012JQ8019)
摘 要:传统的层次分析法(AHP)通常采用1-9标度量化判断矩阵,由于此标度方法存在一致性差、人为主观性强等不足,不便于对雷达导引头干扰效能进行评估。采用指数标度对AHP加以改进,并建立了对主动雷达导引头干扰效能进行评估的模糊综合评判模型,根据导引头固有抗干扰能力和工作特性建立适用于导引头的效能评估指标体系,运用模糊评判方法确定隶属函数,采用指数标度AHP确定各指标权重。并以噪声干扰为例,验证了该模型的有效性。仿真结果表明,采用指数标度的模糊层次分析法(FAHP)得到的一致性比例为0,降低了人为主观因素的影响,提高了对雷达导引头干扰效能评估的准确性和可信度。The traditional Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is always adopting 1-9 criterion quantitative -ability to judge matrix. By so doing, the criterion is poor in consistency, and strong in man-made subjective. This paper proposes an index scale to improve AHP, and establishes a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model to evaluate the jamming effectiveness on radar seeker. The paper builds up an evaluation index system suitable to the radar seeker according to the work principle and function features. The membership function is defined with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, and the weight vector is fixed with AHP of index system. Finally, noise jamming is chosen as an example to verity the effectiveness of the model. The results show that the consistency ratio of fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process with index scale is zero, thus reducing the influence of subjective factor and increasing veracity and reliability of effectiveness evaluation.
关 键 词:雷达导引头 干扰效能 指数标度 层次分析法 模糊综合评判
分 类 号:TN97[电子电信—信号与信息处理] V24[电子电信—信息与通信工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145