书院志归类研究:以方志和地方文献目录为例  

Research on Records of Academy of Classical Learning Classification——Taking Local Records and Local Literature as Example

作　　者：黄建年[1] 陶茂芹[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京财经大学

出　　处：《图书馆理论与实践》2016年第3期34-38,共5页Library Theory and Practice

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究基层项目"民国文献数字化信息组织和智能处理"(项目编号:11YJA870023)的研究成果之一

摘　　要：在方志和地方文献目录体系中,书院志的归类存在一定的差异。全国性综合性方志目录和馆藏方志目录基本不收录书院志,部分地方性方志目录收录书院志,归属于史部地理类专志类目之下,但一般不设立书院专类,亦有少数归属于文化教育大类下。而地方文献目录和数字类方志目录收录范围较宽泛,收录书院志数量较多。There is some difference on the classification of Records of Academy of Classical Learning between local records and local literature. The Records, usually be excluded by the cataloging of national and library local records, is included by certain local records and is classified under the history of the department of geography rather than be classified separately. On the contrary, local literature and digital database of local records are more comprehensive and include a certain number of the Record of Academy of Classical Learning.

关 键 词：书院志 方志目录 数字方志 分类 

分 类 号：G257.33[文化科学—图书馆学] G649.299