检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈文昊
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院,北京100000
出 处:《山西警官高等专科学校学报》2016年第2期16-21,共6页Journal of Shanxi Pollce Academy
摘 要:易科罚金制度与罚金刑易科制度能否纳入我国的刑罚体系之中?对于该问题的探讨近年以来较为激烈,总体而言反对的呼声较高、阻力较大。本文首先对易科罚金制度与罚金易科制度在国外的适用现状加以分析。其次,通过实证方法探究短期自由刑与罚金刑在我国的执行状况,剖析二者在适用上的弊端与优势。再次,提出短期自由刑与罚金刑在适用上的互补与同质关系,针对易科罚金制度与罚金易科制度引入我国的可能性提出一管之见。The subject of whether alternative imposition and criminal fine exchanging institution can be applied in our country's penalty system has been argued for a long time under the strong opposition and large resistance. In this paper,we first analyzed the foreign application situation of the alternative imposition and criminal fine exchanging institution. Then we studied the implementation of short-term penalty against freedom and fine penalty in our country empirically and analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of them.Next,the paper proposed the complementary and homogeneous relationship between short-term penalty against freedom and fine penalty and own opinions on the possibility of introducing alternative imposition and criminal fine exchanging institution into China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.158.217