检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李巍[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学国际关系学院
出 处:《世界经济与政治》2016年第4期112-138,159-160,共27页World Economics and Politics
基 金:2014年度国家社科基金一般项目<中美国际经济制度战略与新型大国关系研究>(批准号:14BGJ051)的部分成果
摘 要:作为金融崛起国和金融霸权国,中国和美国构成当今国际金融外交舞台上的两大核心角色。以2008年国际金融危机的爆发为分水岭,中美两国的国际金融地位发生了相反方向的变化,即中国的金融地位日益强化,而美国的金融霸权地位则有所削弱。这种地位的变迁促使中国采取了"进取型"的金融外交,而美国采取了"守成型"的金融外交,两国之间的金融外交博弈主要表现为围绕对国际金融制度的塑造和控制来展开。一方面,中国努力推动国际金融旧制度的改革,积极参与和主导国际金融新制度的建设,以服务于中国金融崛起的国际制度需要;另一方面,美国却不断拖延甚至阻碍国际金融旧制度的改革,而且抵制中国进行国际金融新制度的建设,以捍卫美国作为金融守成国的既有制度霸权。中美之间正在兴起的国际金融制度竞争是两国金融权力地位、金融公共物品供给能力以及金融制度合法性的竞争,它究竟是呈现相容性还是互斥性将对国际金融治理格局产生深远影响。As a rising financial power and an established financial hegemon respectively,China and the U.S.are the most important players in international financial diplomacy.With the global financial crisis in 2008 as a watershed,the two countries' international financial statuses have changed greatly,yet in opposite directions.To be more specific,the world is witnessing China's lasting financial rise and America's relatively weakening position,which facilitates China's assertive financial diplomacy and makes America adopt a defensive financial diplomacy.The financial diplomatic game between the two countries manifests in their competition in shaping and dominating international financial institutions.On one hand,China is taking efforts to promote the reform of the existing international financial institutions and seek to play a leading role in the building of new institutions so as to consolidate a favorable institutional basis for its financial rise.On the other hand,the U.S.is trying to postpone or even obstruct the reform of international financial institutions and undermining China's endeavor in building new international institutions,in order to maintain its financial hegemony in the world.The competition between the two countries over the international financial institutions is actually for financial status,for capabilities to provide international financial public goods and for legitimacy of their engagement in international financial institutions.Whether their behaviors become increasingly compatible or exclusive of each other will exert lasting impact on international financial governance in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.140.250.157