检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张霞[1]
机构地区:[1]山东政法学院刑事司法学院,山东济南250014
出 处:《政法论丛》2016年第2期112-119,共8页Journal of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家社科基金项目<生态安全犯罪对策研究>(13BFX064);山东省法学会专项课题<污染环境罪司法适用疑难问题研究>(SLS(2015)F13)的阶段性成果
摘 要:恢复性司法模式总体上符合当代刑法谦抑性原则和现代生态文明建设的要求。它作为一种犯罪控制模式,其在涉生态犯罪案件中的具体法律适用中,虽具有很强的现实必要性和较为明晰的针对性,且司法绩效上也已取得了较好的法律效果和社会效果。然而,实践中还存在着司法应用执行体制不完善等若干困境。由此,建议通过相应的专门化立法或特定的司法解释,来有序推动生态恢复性司法的运用,完善量刑制度,并在社区矫正中引入补植复绿等执行体制,规范其具体执行方式,渐次拓展生态恢复性司法的适用空间。Restorative justice is consistent with the modesty principle of criminal law and requirements of ecological civilization construction. As a crime control program,its necessity and pertinence are revealed in specific law applications concerning ecological crimes while promising social and legal effects are achieved in judicial performance. However,predicaments such as faultiness in enforcement systems still lie in practice. Therefore,it is suggested to promote the application of ecological restorative justice orderly,to improve the sentencing system,to introduce enforcement systems such as replanting green into community correction while regulating the implementation of standard mode,and to gradually expand the range of application of ecological restorative justice through specialized legislation and specific judicial interpretation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33