检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]空军工程大学装备管理与安全工程学院,陕西西安710049 [2]西安交通大学绩效管理研究中心,陕西西安710049 [3]陕西师范大学政治经济学院,陕西西安710049
出 处:《科技进步与对策》2016年第7期128-132,共5页Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71103140,71473190)
摘 要:分析了科研问责与科研绩效评价的耦合关系,以不同层级科研管理机构为研究对象,采用耦合协调度模型对耦合关系进行了实证验证。结果表明,当前我国科研项目问责与绩效评价耦合协调度总体处于濒临衰退阶段;与省(市)和副省级城市相比,国家层面的科研项目问责与绩效评价耦合协调度更高;省(市)层面与副省级城市层面的科研项目问责与绩效评价耦合协调度没有明显差异;总体来看,科研问责与绩效评价对科研项目绩效提升的贡献度不高。The coupling effects on accountability and performance evaluation of scientific research project was analyzed from theory level,and the different level of project management system were selected as the object of research,with using the model of coupling coordination degree,the relationship of scientific research project accountability and performance evaluation was verified.These conclusions show:the coupling coordination degree of scientific research project accountability and performance evaluation is still situated in the coordinated declining stage;the national level of project management system has more high coupling coordination degree than others;these are not positive difference in province or municipality and deputy province level of project management system;scientific research project accountability has more contribution than performance evaluation on improving secientific research project performance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229