检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东理工大学马克思主义学院,山东淄博255000
出 处:《山东理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第2期31-36,共6页Journal of Shandong University of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:山东省社会科学规划项目"马克思的正义思想探究"(14-CZ-XJ-12)
摘 要:马克思关于人的社会本质的论断,学界存有质疑并做了新的阐释。其实,马克思的论断与其说是提供了认识人的本质的新路径,倒不如说是反本质主义的。纵观马克思一生的理论探索,他不是尝试澄清人的本质,而是从人的实际生活过程把握人,以人的历史发展程度和丰富程度认识人,由此开启了"认识你自己"及诊断时代弊病和走向历史深处的新路径。仅仅看到马克思有关人的本质论述是不够的,还应该看到马克思在探究路径和思想方面的重要变革。Concerning Karl Marx's remarks on the social essence of human beings,there exist query and new interpretation in the academia. His remarks are not so much a new path to know the essence of human beings as they are anti- essentialism. Throughout his life- long exploration of theories,Marx,instead of clarifying the essence of human being,tried to approach human beings from their actual life and to know them from the degree of their historical development and enrichment,thus began a new phase to " know the self" and diagnose the malpractice of different times,which leads to the depth of history. A study of Karl Marx's remarks on the essence of human beings is not enough,and what has Marx innovated in the path- finding and thought shaping should also be taken into consideration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229