检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈力[1] 胡钋[1] 杨德帅 刘典[1] 王璟[2] 蒋小亮[2]
机构地区:[1]武汉大学电气工程学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]国网河南省电力公司经济技术研究院,河南郑州450052
出 处:《中国电力》2016年第4期154-159,192,共7页Electric Power
基 金:国网河南省电力公司科技项目(SGHAJY00GHJS1400030)~~
摘 要:针对现有评价光伏并网影响指标不足或不尽合理的情况,提出了一套更为全面合理的两级化评价指标体系,对于一级和二级指标,分别采用主观赋权法和熵权法求取权重,从而得到二级指标的综合权重。采用综合权重和逼近理想解的排序方法(technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution,TOPSIS)对光伏并网的影响进行评价,不仅可以体现主观赋权的优越性,同时还能充分利用各种数据信息使评价结果更符合实际情况。实例表明,该方法是一种合理有效的评价方法。The current evaluation index for assessing the impact of grid-connected PV generation is neither adequate nor sufficiently meaningful. This paper proposes a more comprehensive two-stage evaluation index system. The weights of primary and secondary indexes are estimated based on the subjective weight method and the entropy method respectively. The comprehensive weight for the secondary index is then obtained. The comprehensive assessment of the impact of grid-connected PV generation based on comprehensive weights and TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution, TOPSIS) method can not only reflect the superiority of subjective weighting, but also make full use of data information to make the evaluation results more realistic. The case examples show that such approach is a reasonable and effective evaluation method.
关 键 词:光伏并网 评价指标 熵权法 综合权重 TOPSIS法
分 类 号:TM615[电气工程—电力系统及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.131.37.22