检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔贺华[1]
机构地区:[1]河南省漯河市第三人民医院外一科,河南漯河462000
出 处:《罕少疾病杂志》2016年第2期48-49,54,共3页Journal of Rare and Uncommon Diseases
摘 要:目的观察分析阑尾炎患者应用小切口阑尾切除术的治疗效果。方法选取我院2013年6月-2014年6月收治的84例阑尾炎患者,通过随机分组法分为观察组(n=42)和对照组(n=42),对照组患者采用传统阑尾炎切除术,观察组患者采用小切口阑尾切除术,科学评估两组患者临床治疗效果。结果观察组患者手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、住院时间等指标数值相比于对照组明显降低(P<0.05);观察组患者肠瘘、肠梗阻、皮下气肿、感染等并发症发生率较对照组更低(P<0.05),差异具有统计学意义。结论针对阑尾炎患者,小切口阑尾切除术具有创伤小、出血量少、并发症少、住院时间短等优势,有利于提高临床治疗效果,安全性更高,值得临床推广应用。Objective To analyze the clinical effect of small incision appendectomy for appendicitis. Methods From Jun. 2013 to Jun. 2014, a total of 84 patients with appendicitis were selected in our hospital, and they were randomly divided into observation group(42 cases) and control group(42 cases). Patients in the control group were given conventional appendectomy, the other patients in the observation group were given small incision appendectomy. After treatment, the clinical effects of these two groups were evaluated. Results The indicators such as operation time, intra-operative blood loss, incision length, and hospitalization time of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group(P〈0.05), the incidences of intestinal fistula, intestinal obstruction, subcutaneous emphysema and infection in the observation group were also significantly lower than those in the control group(P〈0.05), and their differences were statistically significant. Conclusion For patients with appendicitis, small incision appendectomy which can improve the clinical effects has advantage of less trauma, less bleeding, fewer complications and shorter hospitalization time. Thus, it is worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222