机构地区:[1]解放军第一七五医院(厦门大学附属东南医院)医学影像科,漳州363000 [2]南京军区南京总医院医学影像科
出 处:《中华放射学杂志》2016年第4期274-279,共6页Chinese Journal of Radiology
基 金:漳州市科技计划项目(脊柱区“骨-关节-软组织”联合作用退变性腰腿痛的影像检查诊断,Z07019)
摘 要:目的通过CT检查分析髂静脉压迫综合征(IVCS)的解剖基础及以此分型诊断的影像指标和临床意义。方法回顾分析69例IVCS患者的影像资料,根据CT表现,分为单纯型组(22例,髂静脉单纯由髂动脉在前方压迫)、腰椎退变相关型组(33例,除了髂动脉压迫,还合并下腰椎退行性改变如椎间盘膨凸等从后方嵌入性压迫髂静脉)和其他原因IVCS组(14例,脓肿或血肿);同时选取69名腰椎CT表现正常者为对照组,两组问年龄和性别相匹配。评价指标包括发病年龄、病程、椎前髂静脉通道矢状径、下腰椎前曲度、腰椎退变压迫髂静脉征象、髂静脉压迫部位、栓塞范围及介入治疗效果。患者组与对照组及患者组内的年龄、椎前髂静脉通道矢状径及下腰椎前曲角的两两比较,应用单因素方差分析,Bofferroni检验对均数问的多重比较进行校正;患者各组间髂静脉压迫位置与深静脉栓塞范围的分布差异以及各组介入治疗效果的差异,应用交叉表X2检验。结果腰椎退变相关型IVCS组平均发病年龄(61.5±10.6)岁,单纯型(42.3±6.5)岁,其他原因组(53.1±16.8)岁,差异有统计学意义(F=11.030,P〈0.01)。退变型IVCS椎前髂静脉通道矢状径(2.3±0.5)mm,下腰椎前曲角(121.8±5.4)°;单纯型的分别为(2.5±0.5)mm,(124.4±3.9)°;其他原因组分别为(5.9+2.3)mm和(129.5±5.9)°;对照组分别为(6.4±1.6)mm和(127.5±7.3)°。组间矢状径比较F=125.275,组间前曲角比较F=7.949,P值均〈0.01。腰椎退变相关型IVCS髂静脉受压位置位于腰5椎体正前方者占56%(18/33)、右前方和左前方者各占9%(3/33),腰4—5椎间盘正前方占26%(9/33);而单纯型IVCS患者髂静脉受压位置位于腰5椎体右前方(64%,14/22)、正前方(18%,4/22)及腰4—5�Objective To explore the underlying anatomy of iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) using CT, and discuss the imageological index for subtype diagnosis and potential clinical significance. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the imageological data of 69 IVCS patients from July, 2009 to June, 2014. According to CT findings, patients were categorized to simple IVCS (sIVCS, the lilac vein is compressed by only the anterior iliac artery, n=22), lumbar degeneration-related IVCS ( dIVCS, besides the iliac artery, the lower lumbar degenerative changes including osteophyte, protruded disc, etc. pressed the iliac vein from the back, n=33) and other IVCS causes (oIVCS, including tuberculosis, inflammation and fracture hematoma of the lumbar spine, n=14); meanwhile, 69 age- and sex-matched subjects was set as a control group. Evaluated indexes were onset age, course of lower limb swelling and pain, size of the iliac vein tunnel ahead lumbar (IVTAL), lower lumbar spine forward curvature angle (LLSCA), iliac vein-pressed signs by lower lumbar degeneration, compression sites, scope of deep venous thrombosis and interventional therapeutic effect. The differences of those indexes of various groups were compared. Data as onset age, course of disease, sizes of IVTAL and LLSCA were evaluated using variance analysis of the general linear model, with Bofferroni test correction for multiple comparisons. Data as iliac vein-pressed site, scope of venous embolism and therapeutic effect were assessed by crossing table X2 test. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS17.0 software (SPSS company, Chicago, USA). Bilateral P〈0.05 were considered to be significant. Results The onset mean age was (61.5 ± 10.6) yr. in dlVCS, (42.3 ± 6.5) yr in sIVCS, and (53.1± 16.8) yr. in oIVCS with a significant difference ( F= 11.030, P〈0.01). Mean sagittal diameter of the IVTAL and LLSCA were (2.3±0.5) mm and ( 121.8± 5.4)° in dlVCS and (2.5± 0.5) mm and (124.4±3.9)° in sIV
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...