检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡养军[1]
机构地区:[1]扬州大学法学院
出 处:《北方法学》2016年第2期5-16,共12页Northern Legal Science
基 金:教育部人文社科青年基金项目"不可量物排放的私法调整"(项目编号14YJC820031)的研究成果
摘 要:请求权基础分析法的应用受到立法、法学理论和法律适用方法的制约。相邻关系纠纷的法律适用提供了一个证明。综合性的案例研究表明,在《民法通则》中,相邻关系与侵权责任具有紧密的联系,这种联系在《物权法》的体系内消失了。民法理论在一定程度上影响了相邻关系的类型。复合式的物权保护方法破坏了传统物权请求权理论的纯粹性,却有助于将相邻关系法与侵权责任法进一步区隔开来。在日益复杂的法律环境中,法律适用方法显得十分重要。强调对实在法的理解和研究,重视对法律适用方法的经验积累,是法律进步的必由之路。The analysis method for claim rights basis is applied subject to restraints from legislation,judiciary theories and legal application approaches among which the legal application of adjacent relations is one example. Comprehensive cases have indicated that the adjacent relations are closely connected with tort liability in application of the General Principles of Civil Law,while such connection has vanished in the Property Law. In fact,civil law theory has certain impact on types of adjacent relations. The compound approaches for property rights have undermined the purity of traditional theories on claims for real rights,yet such approach contributes to separate adjacent relations law from tort law. Since under the increasingly complicated legal circumstances,methods for application of law have become more and more important. Therefore,to focus on understanding and studying of positive laws and to emphasize the accumulation of experience with application of law are an inevitable way to progress of law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.143