检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中西医结合护理(中英文)》2015年第1期85-87,共3页Journal of Clinical Nursing in Practice
摘 要:目的探讨无负压自然引流在食管癌术后胃肠减压护理中的应用效果。方法将本院2014年6月—2015年6月收治的80例食管癌患者随机分为观察组和对照组,对照组术后常规负压引流,观察组术后无负压引流,比较2组术后引流量、康复情况以及不良反应。结果观察组术后当天的引流量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。但2组术后1 d、2 d、3 d的引流量以及不良反应、并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组的排气时间、胃管留置时间、住院时间少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论无负压引流不会影响食管癌术后的胃肠减压效果,且能促进患者胃肠功能的恢复。Objective To investigate the effect of non- negative pressure drainage in gas- trointestinal decompression nursing after esophageal carcinoma surgery. Methods A total of 80 pa- tients with esophageal carcinoma in our hospital were randomly divided into observation group and control group, the control group was given conventional negative pressure drainage, and the obser- vation group was given non - negative pressure drainage, and the drainage volume, recovery and ad- verse reactions after the operation of the two groups were compared. Results The drainage volume in the operative day in the observation group was less than that in the control group, there was sta- tistically significant difference (P 〈 0.05). There was no significant difference in drainage volume, adverse reactions and the complication between the two groups after 1 d, 2 d and 3 d after the opera- tion (P 〉0.05). The exhaust time, gastric tube indwelling time and hospitalization time in the ob- servation group was less than that in the control group, there was statistically significant difference (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Non - negative pressure drainage can not affect the gastrointestinal de- compression effect, and it can promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function in esophageal carci- noma patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40