检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:施芹[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏省泗阳县中医院急诊科,江苏泗阳223700
出 处:《中西医结合护理(中英文)》2015年第2期20-21,共2页Journal of Clinical Nursing in Practice
摘 要:目的探讨急诊护理路径在急性心肌梗死患者抢救中的应用效果。方法急性心肌梗死患者50例随机分对照组和观察组,各25例。对照组常规急诊护理流程,观察组实施急诊护理路径干预措施。结果观察组分诊评估时间(0.4±0.2)min,急诊停留时间为(9.1±1.2)min,显著短于对照组的(2.5±0.5)min和(25.3±2.6)min,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组院内心肌梗死复发率8.0%(2/25),低于对照组32.0%(8/25)。结论实施急诊护理路径可缩短急性心肌梗死患者急诊分诊评估和急诊停留时间,降低院内心肌梗死复发生率,值得借鉴。Objective To evaluate the effect of emergency nursing path for patients with a- cute myocardial infarction(AMI). Methods A total of 50 AMI patients were randomly divided into the control group and observation group, with conventional emergency care and interventions based on emergency nursing pathway, respectively. Results The average triage assessment time and length of stay in emergency was (0.4 ± 0.2) minutes and (9.1 ± 1.2) minutes in observation group, and was (2.5 ±0.5 ) minutes and ( 25.3 ±2.6 ) minutes in controls, with a significant difference ( P 〈 0. 05). The observation group had lower incidence of AMI recurrence compared with the controls (8.0% vs. 32.0%, P 〈0.05). Conclusion Applying the emergency nursing pathway can shorten the average triage assessment time and length of stay in emergency in patients with acute AMI.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222