固定污染源烟气手工监测与自动监测系统(CEMS)监测数据比对误差与分析  

Error Analysis on Smoke of Stationary Pollution Source Tested by Manual Monitoring and Continuous Emission Monitoring System(CEMS)

作　　者：杨松 

机构地区：[1]福建立标环境检测有限责任公司,福建泉州362000

出　　处：《福建分析测试》2015年第5期27-30,共4页Fujian Analysis & Testing

摘　　要：通过固定污染源烟气手工监测与自动监测系统(CEMS)监测数据结果比对,探讨现场监测环境对上述两种监测方法数据比对误差的影响。受现场监测环境限制,CEMS系统实际是以现场空气的氧量进行校准,而现场空气又受气态污染物含量的影响,氧含量偏低,因此,以现场的氧量作为测量基准检测气态污染物浓度得出的值与参比方法的监测数据误差较大。Through the manual monitoring and automatic monitoring system of flue gas of stationary pollution sources （CEMS） monitoring data results, the effect of field monitoring of the two monitoring methods data alignment error were dis- cussed. By the field monitoring environmental restrictions, the data of CEMS was calibrated with the oxygen air. But the ox- ygen content air was low, which was affected by gaseous pollutant content. Therefore, the scene of oxygen as the reference value and monitoring data error detection method of gaseous pollutants concentration measurement datum obtained.

关 键 词：自动监测系统CEMS 手工监测 烟气测试 氧含量 误差分析 

分 类 号：X830.5[环境科学与工程—环境工程]