“治理”话语与中国民族理论政策话语体系的丰富  

“Governance”discourse and the improvement of the discourse of Chinese ethnic theories and policies

作　　者：赵刚[1] 

机构地区：[1]延边大学马克思主义学院,吉林延吉133000

出　　处：《云南民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第3期11-16,共6页Journal of Yunnan Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"中国朝鲜族中华民族共同体意识与民族政策研究"(项目编号:15XMZ013)阶段成果

摘　　要：话语即权利,在特定语境和特定的社会历史条件下,话语体系都是一种价值表达。"国家治理体系和治理能力现代化"的提出,为解决和研究民族问题树立了"治理"的价值准则。"治理"话语与我国现行民族理论政策上的"帮助"话语、"自治"话语和"民族关系"话语存有矛盾。贯彻"治理",使我国民族工作主题有了重要目标,使我国民族理论政策有了新内容,并拓宽了我国民族理论政策的执行方式。运用"治理",可以看到当前关于民族问题研究中的"族群""去政治化""第二代民族政策"等话语不符合治理理念和中国特色社会主义治理思想。Discourse is right,and in particular contexts and specific socio- historical conditions,a discourse is a kind of value expression. The concept of ＂the system of national governance and modernization of governance capacity＂has provided a value criterion of＂governance＂in terms of studying and solving ethnic problems. This＂governance＂discourse is incompatible with the existing discourses of ＂help＂,＂autonomy＂and＂ethnic relations＂. The implementation of such＂governance＂has clarified the focus of China＇s ethnic work,added some new content to our ethnic theories and policies as well as relevant approaches. It also reveals the fact that such discourse as ＂ethnic groups＂,＂de- politics＂and ＂second- generation ethnic policy＂in the current studies of ethnic problems are incompatible with the concept of proper ＂governance＂,especially the socialist thought of ＂governance＂with Chinese characteristics.

关 键 词：治理 民族理论政策 话语体系 新话语 

分 类 号：D633[政治法律—政治学]