张岱年先生“中西哲学比较研究”之格式的分析——以“本体论”为例  

The Framework of Zhang Dainian's Comparative Study between Chinese and Western Philosophy Basing on Ontology

作　　者：张耀南[1] 马鸥亚 

机构地区：[1]北京行政学院哲学教研部,北京100044

出　　处：《衡水学院学报》2016年第2期61-69,77,共10页Journal of Hengshui University

摘　　要：不管是从逻辑上看,还是从历史上看,"中西哲学比较研究"之格式,不外三种:一曰"西化比",二曰"并置比",三曰"化西比"。在"本体论"问题上,张岱年先生之观点可分早、中、晚三期:早期采用"化西比",以肯定"中国哲学无西式本体"为主,偶有否定意见;中期采用"并置比",以肯定"中西各有本体论"为主,并特别区分"中式本体论"与"西式本体论";晚期则采用"西化比",以否定"中国哲学无西式本体"为主,偶有肯定意见。张先生在此问题上,始终不愿直接以"西式本体论"释读中土哲学,这是难能可贵的。学界宜突破"近代学术框架"以"西化比"或为上品的格局,而建构以"化西比"或为"最高理想"的学术典范。The framework of the comparative study between Chinese and Western philosophy has three typescomparative approach to westernization, juxtaposition and sinicization, viewing not only in the perspective of logic or that of history. To ontology Zhang Dainian＇s view is divided into three phase. In the early stage, based on sinicization, Zhang Dainian mostly deems that Chinese philosophy hasn＇t the western noumenon while sometimes denies it. In the medium term, he mainly thinks that Chinese philosophy and western philosophy have ontology respectively, and he particularly distinguishes Chinese ontology and Western ontology on the basis of juxtaposition. And in the late stage, he considers that Chinese philosophy has the western noumenon while sometimes accept it by way of westernization. It is estimable that Zhang Dainian is unwilling to interpret Chinese philosophy by the Western ontology. Academia should break modern academic framework to give the priority to westernization and establish academic paradigm by giving the priority to sinicization.

关 键 词：张岱年 本体论 全盘化西 中西哲学比较研究 

分 类 号：B016[哲学宗教—哲学理论]