检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱静辉[1]
机构地区:[1]温州医科大学人文与管理学院
出 处:《中国农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第2期84-94,共11页Journal of China Agricultural University;Social Sciences
摘 要:城乡结合部地区的农村因要素市场化与利益集聚不断冲击着原有的乡村治理体制,基层治理中呈现的"内卷化"与合法性危机成为主要问题。然而农村社区治理主体所产生的变异并没有造成大规模的治理矛盾和冲突,其原因在于"富人治村"或者说灰色力量的渗透有其村庄治理的运作策略,他们的行动策略也会构建一定的治理结构。富人和灰色力量通过利益网络化的策略进入村庄治理结构,在获得村庄治理主体位置的时候又反过来通过利益网络支配村庄治理格局。利益网络化运作是一种双向流动的过程,既是富人得以维持其地位的支撑结构,同时也是他们得以支配村庄的工具。The market trend of rural factor and the agglomeration of interests continue to impacting the existing village gov- ernance system in the urban-rural fringe zone, and the "internalization" and legitimacy crisis presented in the grass-roots governance became a major problem. However, the governance body variation produced by rural communities did not cause large-scale governance contradictions and conflicts. The reason was " the rich governed the village" or the penetration of gray power contained its own operation strategy which built a certain governance structure. Trough the interests network strategy, the rich and gray power entered the village governance structure. While getting the main body position of this structure, they also dominated the structure by the interests network. The operation of the interests network is a two-way flow process, which the rich not only obtained and maintained their position, but getting the power tools to dominated the whole village.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117