WTO《政府采购协定》国内救济规定研究  

The Provisions on Domestic Review Procedures in the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement

作　　者：张幸临[1] 

机构地区：[1]东北财经大学法学院

出　　处：《中国高校社会科学》2016年第3期96-108,157,共13页Social Sciences in Chinese Higher Education Institutions

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"符合GPA要求的政府采购救济机制构建研究"(11YJA820115)阶段性成果

摘　　要：1994年签订的WTO《政府采购协定》中首次要求GPA参加方建立国内政府采购救济机制,并规定了对该机制的原则性要求及该机制应包含的基本内容和相关要求。修订后的GPA2012文本补充修改了原有国内救济规定,将GPA对参加方国内政府采购救济机制的原则性要求重新排序为"及时、有效、透明、非歧视",并对其基本内容进行了一些修订。基于GPA2012规定,可分析归纳出GPA对参加方国内政府采购救济机制中质疑人的范围、质疑处理机构与渠道、供应商提出质疑的时限以及具体救济方法方面的最低标准。我国在改进政府采购质疑与投诉处理机制时应注意满足GPA的这些最低标准要求,并在此基础上适当采用更高标准,以使我国的政府采购救济机制既能满足GPA的相关要求,又能切实有效地发挥作用。In the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement signed in 1994(GPA1994), it is the first time that has required GPA Parties should establish a national challenge system, and general requirements and basic elements of such a system are also set forth. The revised GPA(GPA2012) supplements and revises the provisions on national challenge procedures, and rearranges the order of the aforesaid general requirements as 'timeless, effectiveness, transparency and non-discrimination'. GPA2012 makes certain amendments to the provisions on basic elements of a national challenge system; based on the relevant provisions of the GPA2012, GPA's minimum standards on the scope of complainants, forum for review, the time limit for initiating a challenge, as well as remedies available for suppliers, can be summarized.

关 键 词：《政府采购协定》 救济机制 国内审查程序 供应商 质疑 

分 类 号：D996.2[政治法律—经济法学]