论传统中国个性司法的发生及规制——以清代为中心的考察  

The Mechanism and Restriction Mechanism of Personalized Justice of Traditional China

作　　者：李相森[1] 任佳莹[2] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院,江苏南京210093 [2]解放军理工大学训练部,江苏南京211101

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2016年第3期27-40,共14页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：张仁善教授主持的国家社科基金项目"中国传统司法中的理性与经验研究"(11BFX016)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：形式理性化的现代司法排斥司法主体个性的侵入。但个性司法行为在中国传统司法中真实存在,且具有一定的普遍性。传统法制为司法主体个性作用的发挥留有空间,司法主体的性格、气质、能力等个性因素直接影响司法的进程及结局。但传统司法并非完全由司法者的情绪、偏见等非理性因素主导,更非个体化的恣意专断。传统法制有一套形塑和规制司法主体个性的机制,以保证司法行为的大体稳定和基本取向。以史为鉴,平衡和缓解个性影响司法与依法公正裁判之间的张力,需从塑造司法人员良好个性及完善司法制度两个方面进行。The rational modem judicial excludes the invasion of judicial personality. But the individualistic behavior of judiciary really exists in Chinese traditional justice, and had certain universality. The traditional legal system allowed the individuality of judiciary to play role. The legal character, temperament, ability and personality factors of judiciary directly affect the process and outcome of justice. But the traditional Chinese justice is not the individual arbitrary, or completely dominated by the rational factors such as emotional bias of judiciary. The traditional legal system has a regulation mechanism to shape the individuality of judiciary, and guarantee the stability and the orientation of the judicial behavior. We should shape individuality and improve the system of justice to ease the tension between the individuality and the judicial justice.

关 键 词：个性司法 卡迪司法 传统司法 确定性 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学]