检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁志帆[1]
出 处:《华东经济管理》2016年第5期44-51,共8页East China Economic Management
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(14CJL019)
摘 要:文章根据动态随机一般均衡模型和中国宏观季度数据,考察了财政支出和税收工具的宏观经济效应。研究发现:增加政府支出虽然能够迅速提振经济,但其只有短期效应。如果没有及时退出,其正向促进作用可能转化为反作用力。减税政策对产出和就业同样具有正向促进作用,但政策效果相对较弱。为保障新常态下的中国经济运行于合理区间,应当合理配置财政政策工具,将相机调控和区间调控相结合,短期与中长期调控相结合。Based on the dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model and China's maeroeconomie quarterly data, this paper analyzes the macroeconomic effects of government expenditure and tax instruments. The study finds that increasing govern- ment expenditure can boost economy quickly, but only in a short period. If the expansionary policy does not quit in time, its positive promoting role may be converted to a counterforce. Moreover, tax cut policy also has a positive role in promoting out- put and expanding employment, but the policy effect is not as significant as government expenditure change. To ensure China' s economy operates within a rational range under a new normal, we should not only allocate fiscal policy instruments rational- ly, but also realize the combination of discretion and interval management, the short-term and long-term regulation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.143