检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]成都医学院图书馆,610500 [2]成都医学院第一附属医院科研科 [3]成都医学院科技处
出 处:《中华医学科研管理杂志》2016年第2期113-119,124,共8页Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
基 金:四川省科技厅软科学研究计划项目(2013ZR0082)
摘 要:当前对科技成果创新的评价主要基于专业机构的查新报告,以重复率检索为原理的科技查新无法全面衡量一项科技成果的实际价值,例如成果的实用性、经济性,是否适合生产企业采纳生产等。本文站在应用方使用的角度提出了科技成果创新的有效性评价理论,强调一项新的科技成果创新评价应该增加前置伦理评价、需求度与采纳情况评价、经济性评价等指标,揭示了成果创新随时间推移而衰减创但新有效性反而增强的特殊现象。本文还设计了一套数学计算模型,并进行了实证运用。The current evaluation for scientific and technological achievements and innovation is mainly based on novelty retrieval report conducted by professional organizations. However, such re- trieval could not measure the actual value of a scientific and technological achievements comprehensive- ly, such as the practicality and economic value of the outcome; and possibility to be adopted by indus- try, etc. Current study, from the application aspective, was trying to evaluate the scientific and tech- nological achievements using effectiveness appraisal theory, which emphasis on pre--ethical assess- ment, demand and adoption assessment, and economic value assessment. It reveals the special phe- nomenon that that the outcome of innovation may decay over time, however, the effectiveness of inno- vation would enhance over time. This study also designed a mathematical model and the empirical use.
分 类 号:R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.194.5