《三州辑略》部分哈密内容缺失原因考述  

An Investigation of the Reason Why Some Contents on Hami Are Missing from Three Prefectures Compendium( 《三州辑略》)

作　　者：鲁靖康[1] 

机构地区：[1]山西师范大学历史与旅游文化学院

出　　处：《中国地方志》2016年第5期45-51,64,共7页China Local Records

摘　　要：《三州辑略》的记事范围包括乌鲁木齐、吐鲁番、哈密三地,但哈密地区的资料却缺失了很多内容。《三州辑略》的资料取舍并非按照所属地区来安排,而是严格遵照乌鲁木齐都统职权所及的原则记述。当时哈密办事大臣尚属伊犁将军,通判也已归陕甘总督,都统所辖的哈密职官和事务只有与驻防绿营相关的类项,且不包括屯田,因此纂者不得不将与哈密办事大臣、通判本身相关的内容、归其所管的各项事务并绿营屯田有选择性地剔除。通过《三州辑略》纂修时哈密官员及其所掌事务的归属关系,可以窥见乌鲁木齐都统、陕甘总督、伊犁将军三者之间的权力制衡格局,以及哈密在清代西北地缘政治中所发挥的作用。The recording scope of Three Prefectures Compendium should cover Urumqi,Turpan,and Hami,yet many contents about Hami region are missing. The book's selection of reference materials is not arranged by regions where they belong to,but rather strictly following a recording principle only to cover the authority of the Urumqi General Commander( 都统). Then the Hami Affairs Minister( 哈密办事大臣) was still a subordinate of the Yili General,the Prefecture Magistrate( 通判) has already been subordinate to the Viceroy of Shangan( 陕甘总督),and Hami officials and affairs under the authority of the Urumqi General Commander only covered which related to the garrisoned Green Camp( 绿营) except Tuntian( 屯田,reclamation work by garrisoned troops). Therefore,Three Prefectures Compendium compilers had to selectively weed out contents related to the Hami Affairs Minister,the Prefecture Magistrate and all affairs under their authorities as well as Tuntian affairs of the Green Camp. From the subordinate position of Hami officials and their authorities when Three Prefectures Compendium was compiled,we can have a unique perspective of the power balance between the Urumqi General Commander,the Viceroy of Shangan,and the Yili General,as well as the role of Hami in the geopolitics of Northwestern region in Qing Dynasty.

关 键 词：《三州辑略》 乌鲁木齐都统 陕甘总督 伊犁将军 权力制衡 

分 类 号：K29[历史地理—历史学]