明代同城实土卫所的区划  被引量:2

A Study Of Administrative Divisions Of Wei And Suo In Ming Dynasty

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:李新峰[1] 

机构地区:[1]北京大学历史系,北京100871

出  处:《中国历史地理论丛》2016年第2期115-127,共13页Journal of Chinese Historical Geography

基  金:教育部规划项目"明代行政区划制度研究"(11YJA770024)

摘  要:明代的边疆实土卫所是近似州县的行政区划单位。寄治同城的实土卫所,是像内地大府的双附郭县那样分区划界,还是因陋就简并为一区,尚无明论。本文以实土卫所的屯田分布状况为主要指标,以驿递分布、防区形态、城区分野为辅助指标,分析了辽东、宣府、大同、宁夏、甘州、建昌等地同城卫所的区划状况。本文结论是:明代同城实土卫所中,只有宁夏、甘州的屯田,辽阳、宣府的防区,以及各卫在城内的分野,略具分区色彩。它们没有形成以城中衙署为支点向城外展开的扇形分区,也没有形成各类分区大体一致的连片地带。各卫既没有像双附郭县或其他实土卫所那样明确划分政区,又非彻底混杂,而是介于两种极端状况之间,平等分享或主客共享同一个总辖区。The Wei and Suo, in Ming Dynasty, like Zhou and Xian are administrative units. There are some problems has not yet been determined. Such as whether some Wei and Suo' s dis- tricts, whose capicals are in the same city, had clear dividing line. We have analyze the Wei and Suo mainly with the distribution of wasteland and 3 aided? indexes such as the distrribution of courier sta- tion, the? shape of defence? area, and the urban eset in Liao Dong, Xuan Fu, Da Tong , Ning Xia, Gan Zhou, Jian Chang in Ming Dynasty in this article. We conclude that the dividing line in Ning Xia, Gan Zhou and Xuan Fu are relatively clear. But there no evidence of specific dividing line, in general.

关 键 词:明代 实土卫所 区划 

分 类 号:K248[历史地理—历史学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象