检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田莲华[1] 彭清臻[1] 殷玲玲[1] 胡楠[1] 龚小艳[1] 鲍霁 黄巧英[1] 罗文婷[1]
出 处:《齐鲁护理杂志》2016年第9期1-3,共3页Journal of Qilu Nursing
基 金:湖北省自然科学基金项目(编号:2014CFC1059)
摘 要:目的:探讨全程护理干预对肺癌患者雾化吸入治疗依从性及生活质量的影响。方法:将60例肺癌患者采用双盲法随机分为实验组和对照组各30例,对照组采用常规护理,实验组采用全程护理干预,比较两组治疗依从性、焦虑状况、抑郁状况和生活质量指标评分情况。结果:实验组治疗依从性高于对照组(P<0.05),治疗后实验组生活质量各项指标评分均高于对照组(P<0.05),实验组SAS评分和SDS评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:全程护理干预可提高雾化吸入患者的依从性,提高患者的生活质量,降低焦虑及抑郁等负性情绪。Objective: To explore the effect of whole course nursing intervention on the treatment compliance and quality of life of lung cancer patients with aerosol inhalation therapy. Methods: 60 patients with lung cancer were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group( 30 cases in each group) by using double-blind method. The routine nursing care was taken in the control group and the whole course nursing intervention was implemented in the experimental group,the treatment compliance and the scores of anxiety,depression and quality of life of the patients were compared between the two groups. Results: The treatment compliance of the patients was better in the experimental group than the control group( P〈0. 05); the scores of quality of life were higher in the experimental group than the control group after treatment( P〈0. 05); the scores of SAS and SDS were lower in the experimental group than the control group( P〈0. 05). Conclusion: The whole course nursing intervention can improve the treatment compliance of the patients,improve their quality of life and relieve their negative emotion,anxiety and depression.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229