检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李张兵[1]
机构地区:[1]南京大学,江苏南京210093
出 处:《太平洋学报》2016年第5期32-40,共9页Pacific Journal
摘 要:南沙争端在和平学冲突理论范式下呈现对称性与非对称性冲突结构。争端双方对冲突的应对能力、战略诉求、意志决心以及冲突预期表现出巨大差异,呈现非对称性特点,但周边国家对快速崛起的中国产生战略疑虑、域外国家对南海周边国家或明或暗地支持、南沙岛礁地理位置距离南海周边国家相对较近以及南海周边国家对岛礁实际掌控等因素,皆对中国的优势地位构成牵制,形成南沙争端的对称性特征。而和平学的冲突三角理论及冲突转化理论,对解释和解决南沙争端具有启发意义。The dispute of the Nansha Islands has been seen in the structure of conflict between symmetry and asymmetry by Peace Study. The two parties in the conflict have many asymmetric things such as the abilities of solving the conflict,appeals for strategy,persistent resolution and desired goals to acquire in the conflict. But many factors have led to the symmetry of the dispute. Those are as follows,many countries around the China have strategic suspicion for Chins' s fast and continuous development; some countries outside the South China Sea stand publicly or privately with those countries around the sea except China; the location of the Nansha Islands is far away from China but nearby toward the countries around the South China Sea; furthermore,China has not been in charge of many of the Nansha Islands. All these have countervailed the advantage position of China in the Sea. Meanwhile,how to explain and solve the dispute of the Nansha Islands maybe gain enlightenment from the concepts of conflict triangle and conflict transfer from Peace Study.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40