刑法司法解释溯及力问题的整体诠释  

General Comprehension on the Retroactivity of Criminal Judicial Interpretation

作　　者：王兵兵[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210046

出　　处：《辽宁警察学院学报》2016年第3期11-16,共6页Journal of Liaoning Police College

摘　　要：刑法司法解释的溯及力问题一直困扰着司法机关的法律适用。司法解释尽管是有权机关所制定,但是依然要遵守解释的一般原理,恪守罪刑法定原则。在司法解释的三种类型中,对于纯粹的口号性宣示和对刑法条文的进一步精确化规定,都属于在刑法条文本身的含义范围之内的阐释,根本不存在所谓的溯及力问题。司法解释中的拟制性条款,由于突破了刑法条文的含义,有违反罪刑法定的嫌疑,不应予以适用,必要时还可进行违宪审查。The application of law of judicial authority is always bothered by the retroactivity of criminal judicial interpretations. Although judicial interpretations are formulated by power institution, the general interpretation principles and the legal principle of crime and punishment must be observed. Judicial interpretations have three types. The attention regulation and the specific provisions have no the problem of retroactivity. The artificial terms in judicial interpretations should not be quoted because they have suspicion of in violation of the legal principle of crime and punishment, and the unconstitutional review should be accepted when necessary.

关 键 词：司法解释 溯及力 类型 罪刑法定 

分 类 号：D910.5[政治法律—法学]