规制学术不当行为的比较分析和借鉴  

Comparative Analysis and Reference to the Regulation of Academic Misconduct

作　　者：李玉香[1,2] 李梦雪[3] 丁如意[3] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学 [2]中国政法大学知识产权法研究所 [3]不详

出　　处：《科技与法律》2016年第2期384-396,共13页Science Technology and Law

基　　金：司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目(项目编号:12SFB4005)

摘　　要：国内外关于学术不当行为的界定虽在表述上有所差异,但本质上并无大分歧。然而,对于学术不当行为的规制,我国在立法、机构设置、处罚方式与力度等方面与发达国家有较大的差异。面对近年来我国愈演愈烈的学术不当行为,中国的学术界正在被猖獗的学术不当行为所侵蚀;通过国内外规制学术不当行为的经验的比较分析和借鉴,对完善我国规制学术不当行为提出了相关的建议。Although there are differences in the definition of academicmisconduct at home and abroad, essentially there is no big difference. However, Interms of the regulation of academic misconduct, there are great differences in theaspects of legislation, organization setting, punishment mode and so onbetween thedeveloped countries and our country. In recent years, academic misconduct in ourcountry is being more and more serious, China’s academic community is being erodedby rampant academic misconduct. Making the comparative analysis and reference hasbecome an important issue that must be solved at present in the field of prevention andcontrol of academic misconduct.

关 键 词：学术不当 学术腐败 比较研究 借鉴和建议 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]