放射状多切口加浮线引流治疗65例肛周马蹄形脓肿的临床观察  

Clinical observation on treating 65 cases of perianal abscess of horseshoe by drainage

作　　者：吴荣发[1] 王坚[1] 魏晓丹[1] 李小玲[1] 罗观洋[1] 陈惠文[1] 王美容[1] 

机构地区：[1]福建中医药大学附属泉州市中医院,福建泉州362000

出　　处：《中医临床研究》2016年第10期87-89,共3页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine

摘　　要：目的:将放射状多切口加浮线引流术和传统切开引流术两种方法对肛周马蹄形脓肿的疗效进行对比研究,探讨放射状多切口加浮线引流技术的可靠性及其是否可以替代传统疗法。方法:将2013年10月-2015年3月65例肛周马蹄形脓肿患者随机分为实验组和对照组。实验组33例采用中西结合放射状多切口加浮线引流技术治疗,对照组32例采用传统切开引流术治疗。结果:实验组手术成功率显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:放射状多切口加浮线引流技术治疗马蹄形肛周脓肿的疗效确切,并可降低术后并发症发病率,保护肛门括约肌和正常的生理解剖结构,在临床应用中可替代传统治疗方法。Objective To compare efficacy between radial incision plus float line drainage technology and traditional incisiondrainage technology on perianal abscess of horseshoe. Methods： 65 cases were randomly divided into two groups： 33 cases in the treatmentgroup and 32 cases in control group. The treatment group was treated by radial incision plus float line drainage technology, and the controlgroup was treated by incision drainage technology. Results： According to the data, in the treatment group, the total efficiency was better（P〈0.05）. Conclusion： Radial incision plus float line drainage technology was effective on perianal abscess of horseshoe, by reducing theincidence of surgical complications, protecting the anal sphincter and normal physiological anatomy, and can alternative to traditionaltherapy in clinical application.

关 键 词：肛周马蹄形脓肿 引流 

分 类 号：R657.15[医药卫生—外科学]