检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘向阳
出 处:《中医临床研究》2016年第11期44-45,共2页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察透骨针刺疗法配合颈椎定点旋转复位法治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效。方法:将90例神经根型颈椎病患者随机分为治疗组45例和对照组45例,其中治疗组采用透骨针刺疗法配合颈椎定点旋转复位法,对照组采用夹脊电针疗法配合常规推拿按摩治疗,两组均治疗2个疗程。结果:治疗组治愈32例,显效7例,有效4例,无效2例,总有效率为95.6%;对照组治愈21例,显效6例,有效9例,无效9例,总有效率为80.0%。两组总有效率经统计学分析,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:透骨针刺疗法配合颈椎定点旋转复位法对神经根型颈椎病的治疗明显优于夹脊电针疗法配合常规推拿按摩。Objective To observe clinical efficacy of acupuncture and manipulation on cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Methods:90 cases were divided into the treatment group and control group, 45 cases in each group. The treatment group took acupuncture andmanipulation; the control group took the Jiaji electro-acupuncture and massage, for 2 courses. Results: In the treatment group, 32 caseswere cured; 7 cases were effective; 4 cases were a little effective; 2 cases were invalid; the total efficiency was 95.6%. In the control group,21 cases were cured; 6 cases were effective; 9 cases were a little effective; 9 cases were invalid; the total efficiency was 80.0% (P〈0.05).Conclusion: The efficacy of acupuncture and manipulation was better in clinic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38