常用乳腺影像诊断方法的比较研究  

Comparative research of common breast imaging diagnostic approaches

作　　者：陈红梅[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南省商丘市第一人民医院放射科,476100

出　　处：《中国实用医药》2016年第9期10-11,共2页China Practical Medicine

摘　　要：目的研究比较常用乳腺影像诊断方法的诊断准确性。方法 200例乳腺疾病患者为研究对象(确诊为乳腺癌101例,乳腺良性病变99例),所选患者均进行彩色多普勒超声检查、钼靶检查以及近红外线检查,观察分析3种影像诊断方法的准确率情况。结果多普勒超声检查、钼靶检查以及近红外线检查对乳腺癌的诊断准确率分别为87.1%、90.1%、74.3%,多普勒超声检查、钼靶检查的准确率显著优于近红外线检查(P<0.05);炎性病变和导管瘤患者的诊断准确率多普勒超声检查、钼靶检查显著优于近红外线检查,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论常用乳腺影像诊断方法中多普勒超声检查、钼靶检查的诊断准确率较高,具有临床推广的应用价值。Objective To research accuracy in diagnosis by common breast imaging diagnostic approaches. Methods A total of 200 patients with breast cancer as study subjects（101 diagnosed cases with breast cancer and 99 cases with benign breast lesion） received color Doppler ultrasonography, molybdenum target examination and near infrared ray inspection. Accuracy of these 3 approaches were observed and analyzed. Results Accuracy by Doppler ultrasonography, molybdenum target examination and near infrared ray inspection in diagnosis of breast cancer were respectively 87.1%, 90.1% and 74.3%. Doppler ultrasonography and molybdenum target examination showed obviously better accuracy than near infrared ray inspection（P〈0.05）. In diagnosis of patients with inflammatory lesion and duct tumor, Doppler ultrasonography and molybdenum target examination also showed better accuracy than near infrared ray inspection, and their differences all had statistical significance（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Among common breast imaging diagnostic approaches, Doppler ultrasonography and molybdenum target examination provdie higher accuracy, and they contain application value for clinical promotion.

关 键 词：乳腺影像诊断方法 多普勒超声检查 钼靶检查 近红外线检查 

分 类 号：R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R655.8[医药卫生—诊断学]