检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《北方经贸》2016年第5期54-56,71,共4页Northern Economy and Trade
摘 要:随着信息化时代的到来,3D打印技术的发展使"全民制造"成为可能,3D打印数据文件的传播方式对我国现有专利制度产生了极大的冲击。美国专利间接侵权制度较为完善,为3D打印设备生产商和销售商、专利品CAD数据文件提供者和3D打印数据共享平台运营商间接侵权行为的认定提供了依据。面对专利侵权的新模式,我国知识产权立法中没有关于间接侵权的规定,使得专利权利人和公众利益失衡。通过对美国间接侵权归责原则的评析,探讨了我国间接侵权制度的构建问题。With the advent of the information age, the development of 3D printing technology makes the manufacturing possible.The mode of transmission of 3D print data file has a significant impact on the existing patent system in our country.The indirect infringement system of the United States patent is more perfect,which provide for 3D printing equipment manufacturers and vendors, patent CAD data file provider and 3D print data sharing platform operators to provide a basis for indirect infringement.In the face of the new mode of patent infringement,there is no regulation on indirect infringement in the legislation of intellectual property rights in China,making the patent holder and the Public Interest imbalance.Through the analysis of the principle of liability of indirect infringement in the United States,the construction of indirect infringement system in our country is discussed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7