“入户抢劫”量刑合理化的路径  

The Approach to Make the Sentencing of “Housebreaking Robbery” Reasonable

作　　者：武晓雯[1] 

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084

出　　处：《法学杂志》2016年第5期127-140,共14页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：针对"入户抢劫"的法定刑过重以及量刑畸重的现象,大多数刑法学者选择的路径是通过对构成要件进行限制解释来限缩"入户抢劫"的成立范围,从而达到量刑合理化的目的。但是,过度的限制解释所产生的弊端是相当明显的。建议:一是提倡法官注重法定刑的分配,对单纯的"入户抢劫"行为只能分配"十年以上有期徒刑",而不能分配"无期徒刑或者死刑",从而使"入户抢劫"的法定最高刑受到限制;二是提倡以积极的态度合理适用我国《刑法》中有关减轻处罚的制度,从而解决"入户抢劫"的法定最低刑过高的问题。In the judicial practice, the sentencing of ＂ housebreaking robbery＂ is always overweight. The majority of criminal law scholars always try to avoid this phenomenon by restricting the explanation of the elements to make the sentencing more rational. But the defects of undueexplanations cannot be ignored. For this reason, this paper try to choose the other two ways： （1） to advocate the judge pay more attention to the distribution of statutorysentence, arguing that ＂housebreaking robbery＂ can only be punished with 10 -25 years in prision rather than life imprisonment or death penalty. Then the maximum statutory penalty of ＂housebreaking robbery＂ will be limited;（2） to advocate the rational use of the rules regarding reduced penalty in Criminal Law. Then the problem of excessive minimum statutory penalty will be solved.

关 键 词：“入户抢劫” 限制解释 法定刑分配 减轻处罚 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]