检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:龚正[1] 张彩云[1] 王艳华 占明[1] 张凌云[1] 向光明[1] 陈世雄[1] 董传江[1]
机构地区:[1]湖北省宜昌市中心人民医院呼吸内科,湖北宜昌443000 [2]湖北省兴山县人民医院呼吸内科,湖北兴山443700
出 处:《中国内镜杂志》2016年第4期6-9,共4页China Journal of Endoscopy
基 金:湖北省卫计委科研项目(No:WJ2015MB173);宜昌市卫生科技项目(No:A14301-06)
摘 要:目的比较气管镜介入联合局部丝裂霉素C与气管镜介入治疗气管切开术后气道狭窄的疗效。方法将38例气管切开术后气道狭窄患者随机分为两组,观察组和对照组各19例。观察组采用气管镜介入联合局部丝裂霉素C,对照组采用气管镜介入治疗术。观察两组咳嗽、呼吸困难症状,治疗次数、住院时间和治疗费用。结果观察组患者咳嗽症状积分、VAS评分较对照组低(P<0.05),两组患者呼吸困难程度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组再治疗次数、住院时间和治疗费用低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论气管镜介入联合局部丝裂霉素C治疗气管切开术后气道狭窄的疗效优于气管镜介入。Objective To compare the effect of interventional bronchoscopy combined with local Mitomycin C and bronchoscope interventional therapy in treatment of tracheotomy airway stenosis. Methods 38 cases of patients after tracheotomy airway stenosis were randomly divided into two groups, observation group and control group with 19 cases in each group. The observation group with interventional bronchoscopy combined with local Mitomycin C, the control group using bronchoscopic interventional therapy. Two groups were observed cough, dyspnea symptoms, treatment times, hospitalization time and costs. Results The observation group of patients with cough symptom score,VAS score lower than the control group(P〈0.05), two groups of patients with no significant difference in the degree of dyspnea(P〉0.05). The observation group, the number of times of treatment, hospitalization time, costs less than the control group(P〈0.05). Conclusions Bronchoscopic interventional therapy combined with Mitomycin C local airway stenosis is more effective than interventional bronchoscopy after tracheotomy.
关 键 词:气管镜介入 丝裂霉素C 气管切开术后气道狭窄
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249