检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京中医药大学附属医院北19区,江苏南京210029 [2]南京中医药大学附属医院门诊 [3]南京中医药大学附属医院南20区 [4]南京中医药大学附属医院南西7区 [5]南京中医药大学附属医院南西17区
出 处:《解放军护理杂志》2016年第5期55-57,共3页Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
基 金:国家南京中医药大学护理学一级学科开放基金课题(YSHL0201-25)
摘 要:目的 探讨辩证取穴耳压法对失眠症的治疗效果,并对穴位进行有效筛选,组成高效处方,优化治疗方案,进一步规范耳压技术。方法 便利抽样选择2013年10月至2014年12月江苏省中医院住院患者100例,随机分为辩证取穴组、常规取穴组各50例。常规取穴组选用基本穴位,辩证取穴组每次选基本穴位3~5个,再根据临床证型辩证选穴2~3个,组成穴位配方,30d后对两组患者匹茨堡睡眠质量指数量表(Pittsburgh sleep quality index,PSQI)评分和总体疗效进行评价。结果辩证取穴组在PSQI评分、总体疗效方面均优于常规取穴组,差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。结论 辩证取穴耳压法对患者睡眠改善的效果明显优于常规取穴,值得临床进一步推广应用。Objective To explore the effect of dialectical auricular point sticking method in insomnia treatment, and select effective auricular points, composite efficient formulation to optimize the method of treatment and fur- ther standardize the auricular point sticking technology. Methods By convenience sampling, 100 cases were select- ed and equally divided into basic points and dialectical acupoint group. The conventional acupoint group was applied with the basic acupoint, while the dialectical acupoint group received 3--5 basic points and 2--3 acupoints accord- ing to the clinical syndrome. The Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) and overall effect of both groups after 30 days of treatment were evaluated.Results The PSQI score and overall effect in dialectical acupoint group were better than conventional acupoint group (all P 〈0.05).Conclusions The dialectical auricular point sticking method has good effect on insomnia treatment, and it is worth to be further popularized.
分 类 号:R163[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7