检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875 [2]南昌大学法学院,江西南昌330031
出 处:《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第3期71-76,共6页Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences)
基 金:江西省高校人文社科重点研究基地课题"食品安全综合治理法律机制研究"(JD1408)阶段性成果
摘 要:从1997年《刑法》到2015年《刑法修正案(九)》,有关多次违法行为犯罪化的立法规定逐渐增多,成为我国刑事立法中一个独特的立法例。多次违法行为犯罪化的理论依据主要有人身危险性说、人格责任说、量变质变说和社会危害性说,其中,社会危害性说较为合理。作为一种刑事立法现象,在我国多次违法行为犯罪化正逐渐成为一种固化的立法模式,但学者对其正当性、合理性等仍有质疑,而此种立法仍应按照刑事立法的科学性要求,严格遵循谦抑性原则、经济性原则、禁止重复评价原则和协调性原则。From the Criminal Law of 1997 to 2015Criminal Law Amendment(Ⅸ),laws on criminalization of repeated illegal actions are gradually increased and become a unique legislation instance of the criminal legislation of our country.There are several theories of criminalization of repeated illegal actions:personal dangerousness doctrine,quantitative to qualitative rules,responsibility of personality and social harmfulness doctrine.Among these theories social harmfulness doctrine is reasonable.As a phenomenon of criminal legislation,China’s criminalization of repeated illegal actions is becoming a solidification of the legislative model,yet the scholars still question the legitimacy and rationality of the legislation.And such legislation should still be in accordance with the requirements of the scientific nature of criminal legislation,following the modesty principle,economic principle,prohibition of repetitive evaluation principle and harmony principle.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.53