“新史学”：从思潮到流派--基于比较视野的考察  

The Evolution of Liang Qichao's New Historiography(xinshixue) from an Idea to a School: A Comparative Perspective

作　　者：刘永祥[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]中国海洋大学社会史研究所 [2]邮编:266100

出　　处：《史学理论研究》2016年第2期67-76,158-159,共10页Historiography Bimonthly

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“20世纪‘新史学’典范的生成及影响研究”(14CZS001)阶段性研究成果.

摘　　要：梁启超以历史解释、史学致用、社会整体、科际整合以及历史编纂等为基本要素所粗略建构的"新史学"范式,在"五四"以后并未被新历史考证学终结,而是得到继承、拓展和深化。这一时期,梁启超本人的变化体现在思想资源获取途径以及中西文化态度方面,而非治史范式的转移。与此同时,许多学者沿着相似路径继续探索,在新的时代条件下,广泛摄取西方学术养分,实现了新史学理论的二次提升。故此,新史学与新历史考证学、马克思主义史学一齐构成中国现代史学的三大干流,且三者之间并非截然对立、水火不容,而是相互渗透、相互影响。In proposing his idea of 'new historiography',Liang Qichao attempted to construct a new paradigm in historical study,which covered such basic areas as historical interpretation,historical function,historical style,and history's relation with other disciplines. This new paradigm,the author argues,was not forsaken in the subsequent May Fourth era with the rise of the 'Historical Source'school. Instead,he believes that Liang's ideas became developed and entrenched during the period. Having had more exposure to the changes of Western culture,Liang himself had modified his attitude toward the Chinese cultural tradition.But overall,he did not entirely change his position. Instead,he further developed his ideas of 'new historiography,' turning it into one of the three major trends in modern Chinese historiography.Complementing one another,Liang's 'new historiography'was also equally significant as the 'Historical Source'school and Marxist school in modern China.

关 键 词：梁启超 新史学 新历史考证学 马克思主义史学 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]