对针灸学术流派划分的思考  

On the partition of acupuncture academic schools

作　　者：杨鹏燕[1] 罗玺[2] 夏有兵[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]南京中医药大学,江苏南京210029 [2]南京医科大学,江苏南京210029

出　　处：《中国针灸》2016年第5期552-556,共5页Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion

摘　　要：目前针灸学术流派的研究进行得如火如荼,但是针灸学术流派的划分却仍然没有一个被学者们广泛接受的方式。本文通过梳理历代学者关于针灸学术流派的划分方式,归纳出具有代表性的"五分法""十八分法"和"二阶段分类法"。进而在深入评析3种划分方式各自存在的问题与合理之处的基础上,尝试提出了一种新的针灸学术流派划分方式,即先从整体上将针灸流派划分为古代、近代、现代3个阶段,然后再进行相应子流派划分的"三阶段分类法"。笔者认为,通过这样的一种划分,不但可以弥补目前大多数划分方式的不足,而且还可以通过对3个阶段针灸学术流派之间的分化与交流的考察,在一个新的视角下寻求目前困扰着大多数学者的针灸学术流派的传承与发展新模式。Nowadays extensive attention has been paid on the research of acupuncture academic schools,however,a widely accepted method of partition of acupuncture academic schools is still in need.In this paper,the methods of partition of acupuncture academic schools in the history have been arranged,and three typical methods of＂partition of five schools＂＂partition of eighteen schools＂and＂two-stage based partition＂are summarized.After a deep analysis on the disadvantages and advantages of these three methods,a new method of partition of acupuncture academic schools that is called＂three-stage based partition＂is proposed.In this method,after the overall acupuncture academic schools are divided into an ancient stage,a modern stage and a contemporary stage,each school is divided into its sub-school category.It is believed that this method of partition can remedy the weaknesses of current methods,but also explore a new model of inheritance and development under a different aspect through the differentiation and interaction of acupuncture academic schools at three stages.

关 键 词：针灸流派 学术流派 划分 方式 

分 类 号：R245[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]