检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马宽[1] 王崑声[1] 王婷婷[1] 章威[1] 党丽芳
机构地区:[1]中国航天系统科学与工程研究院,北京100048
出 处:《科技管理研究》2016年第10期25-29,共5页Science and Technology Management Research
摘 要:由于传统技术成熟度评价标准规范以航天和武器系统为背景制定,为适应使用范围扩大和技术多样性带来的挑战,需要研究更加通用和易用的评价标准。在国家科技重大专项技术成熟度评价研究与实践基础上,面向设备类技术研究更加通用的技术成熟度标准。首先,选取了五个具有代表性的技术成熟度评价标准规范,通过对比分析提出了需要研究提高标准通用化的问题。然后,以继承性、通用性和易用性为原则,重点研究提出了技术成熟度相关术语,各级定义、内涵和要求并举例说明。设备类技术成熟度通用评价标准更突出各级核心要求和不同级别的差异,更具有通用性也更容易理解和使用。The Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) is becoming a globally accepted benchmarking tool for assessing the maturity of a specific technology. Based on the TRL assessment research and practice within the National Science and Technology Major Projects, this research paper mainly studies a more general assessment criteria of TRL for equipment technology. First, this research paper studies the similarities and differences among the TRL standard or guidance of DoD, NASA, DoE, ISO and GJB, and puts forward the questions which need to further improve the generalization of the TRL standard. Second, based on the background of equipment technology, this paper puts forward more standard and general terms and specifications which will be used in the general TRL standard. Third, this research paper mainly studies a more general TRL standard, including definition, description, and example for each TRL grade. On the premise of being consistent with the international mainstream TRL standards, the improved TRL criteria can be more efficient in distinguishing the differences among each TRL grade, more general for all kinds of technology, and more easily to understand and use.
分 类 号:E92[军事—军事装备学] V57[兵器科学与技术—武器系统与运用工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15