检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海金融学院,上海201203 [2]上海交通大学安泰经济管理学院,上海200431
出 处:《河南社会科学》2016年第3期62-73,123,共12页Henan Social Sciences
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究项目(12yjc630163)
摘 要:我国2013年1月1日生效的将投资者税负与持股时间长短挂钩的差异化股利税政策是否达到了促进投资者长期持股、减少炒作性交易的目标,是股利税改革应该关注的焦点问题。尽管差异化股利税政策整体上未能降低股票交易的年度平均换手率,但在政策出台后较高证券投资基金持股和高分红股票的换手率下降;此外,差异化股利税生效后分红股票在其除权除息日附近的超额换手率显著下降。这些证据都与政策预期一致,说明2013年实施的差异化股利税政策在降低股票换手率方面具有一定效果,尤其是对高分红和高证券投资基金持股的公司效果更加显著。On January 1, 2013, differentiated dividend tax, a policy in which investors' tax burden pegged to the duration of share holding, took effect in China. Whether this policy has met the goal of facilitating investors' share holding in the long run as well as curbing speculative trading, that is a question deserves our attention. Researches have shown that although differentiated dividend tax policy did not bring down the annual turnover rate of share trading, it did reduce the turnover rate of share holding of higher securities investment funds and high dividend shares; besides, the excessive turnover rate of dividend shares around ex-dividend day drastically declined. These results coincide with our expectation,demonstrating the effectiveness of differentiated dividend tax policy on the reduction of shares turnover rate, especially on high dividend and high securities investment funds companies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4