检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]惠州经济职业技术学院,广东惠州516057 [2]惠州亿纬锂能股份有限公司电源系统事业部,广东惠州516006
出 处:《汽车电器》2016年第5期1-6,共6页Auto Electric Parts
摘 要:增程式电动汽车除了安全可靠性外,能否在公交领域得到大规模推广应用,增程式电动客车的运行成本,即运行经济性的优势是非常关键的。本文通过测试不同条件下增程式电动客车运营油耗及节油率,与混合动力模式、LNG、燃油车的经济性进行对比,得出在现有政府补贴情况下,9.2 m增程式电动客车使用期内累计使用成本最低,较燃油车相比要低39.8万元,在没有政府补贴情况下,与燃油车相比也要低4.8万元,经济性突出,适合规模化推广的结论。To make range-extended electric bus get large scale promotion in public area, except security and reliability, the operating economic efficiency is very critical This paper tests the fuel consumption and fuel saving ratio of range-extended electric bus, and compares economic efficiency of it with hybrid-power, LNG and fuel-driven vehicles. The results show that, at current government subsidy rate, 9.2 m range-extended electric bus has the lowest accumulated operating cost, which is ¥398k lower than fuel-driven vehicles. Even without the government subsidy, its cost is still ¥48k lower. Thus the range-extended electric bus is economic efficient and suitable for large scale promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.190.207.221