欧盟竞争法公共执行最终意见在私人诉讼中的证明效力研究  

On the Probative Effect of the Final Decision of Public Enforcement in the Private Action in European Union

作　　者：剌森 

机构地区：[1]德国汉堡大学法学院,德国汉堡d20148

出　　处：《法学论坛》2016年第3期152-160,共9页Legal Forum

摘　　要：在反垄断执行同时存在公共执行和私人执行两种执行系统的情况下,一个重要的问题是公共执行的最终意见能否在私人诉讼中具有一定程度上的证明效力。美国与欧盟都先后建立了约束力规则或初步证据规则,其主要目标一方面在于减轻原告的举证责任,另一方面在于维持公私执行的一致性同时节省执行成本。但是对约束力规则或初步证据规则的质疑也同时存在,尤其是在司法独立以及被告的程序性权利保障等方面。通过讨论欧盟的公共执行意见在其后的民事反垄断诉讼中的证明效力规则,可为我国统合公私执行,保证法律适用的一致性提供借鉴。As regards the coexistence of the public and private enforcement in the dual enforcement system of the competition law, an important issue is whether the final decision of the public enforcement has a probative value on the private action. US and EU have established the binding rule or prima faeie rule respectively on this issue, which aimed to lighten the burden of proof on claimant on one hand, on the other hand to safeguard the consistent application of the competition law and to save the enforcement cost as well. However, the doubts on the binding rule or prima facie rule do exist, especially on the judicial independence and the safeguard of the procedural rights of defendants, etc. This paper will focus on the discussion of the effect of the final decision of the EU public enforcement, attempting to make comparison with the Chinese Judicial Interpretation on AML and the experience of enforcement, to propose the related suggestions so as to integrate the public and private enforcement as well as ensure the con- sistent application of the law.

关 键 词：公共执行机关的最终意见 证明效力 私人诉讼 欧盟损害赔偿诉讼指令 

分 类 号：D99[政治法律—国际法学]