检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]同济大学土木工程学院,上海200092 [2]同济大学建筑设计研究院(集团)有限公司,上海200092
出 处:《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》2016年第4期550-558,共9页Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基 金:上海市优秀技术带头人计划(14XD1423900);上海市科技攻关计划(09dz1207704)
摘 要:为充分利用调谐液体阻尼器(TLCD)的经济性和调谐质量阻尼器(TMD)的高效性,提出一种TLCD与TMD相结合的组合调谐阻尼器(CTD),从理论上说明CTD的合理性,推导其运动方程,引入协同损失因子评价其减振性能,并与TLCD和TMD的减振效果进行对比分析.研究表明:CTD不同参数配置时,协同损失因子不同,可达35%;相同参数配置下,CTD减振效果介于TMD和TLCD之间.综合经济和效率因素,CTD是一种很有竞争力的减振手段,具有广阔的工程应用前景.To fully utilize the high efficiency of the tuned mass damper (TMI)) and the economic advantage of the tuned liquid column damper (TLCD), a combined tuned damper (CTD) was proposed, and the wind-induced vibration mitigation effects of super tall buildings with such a combined tuned damper, were investigated. A kinematic equation was derived, which verified the feasibility of CTD theoretically. The collaborative loss coefficient was proposed to evaluate the performance loss due to the direct connection of TMD and TLCD to the structure of CTD. A comparative study was made of the vibration control efficiency of CTD with those of TMD and TLCD. The results show that the CTD with different parameters performs differently in vibration control and leads to different collaborative loss coefficients. The maximum collaborative loss coefficient can be up to 35 %. With the same parameters, the vibration control of CTD is between those of TLCD and TMI), which makes CTD a competitive vibration control option.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.143.110