检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南通大学附属东台市人民医院药学科,江苏省东台224200
出 处:《中国基层医药》2016年第10期1489-1492,I0003,共5页Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
基 金:江苏百特生物药学基金立项课题(苏药会字[2014]79号)
摘 要:目的:分析该院运行前置性医嘱审核干预工作中常见的不合理输液处方类型。方法统计该院2014年度经临床药师处方审核管理系统审核的门诊输液处方合格率,分析退回的常见不合理输液处方的种类及其构成。结果退回最多的处方类型是书写不规范或录入错误,占35.19%,输液处方合格率为99.15%,较2011年未实行前置性医嘱审核系统时的输液处方合格率91.53%有所提高。结论通过对门诊输液处方实时审核干预,可以提高输液处方质量,促进门诊输液用药安全、有效。Objective To analyze type of irrational outpatient infusion prescriptions returned by clinical pharmacists'pre -prescription review and intervention in our hospital.Methods Outpatient infusion prescriptions reviewed by clinical pharmacists in 2014 were statistically analyzed in terms of type,constitution and rate of qualified prescriptions.Results Type of unstandard writing or input errors prescriptions accounted for 35.19%,which was the great majority of the irrational outpatient infusion prescriptions.The rate of qualified prescriptions was 99.15%,which was higher than 91.53% in 2011 when pre -prescription review and intervention had not implemented.Conclusion Pre -prescription review and intervention could improve the quality of outpatient infusion prescriptions.Finally,safety and effectiveness of outpatient infusion could be guaranteed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.155