检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈雁萍[1]
出 处:《国际医药卫生导报》2016年第9期1281-1283,共3页International Medicine and Health Guidance News
摘 要:目的探讨来氟米特联合环磷酰胺冲击治疗对重症顽固性狼疮肾患者的疗效。方法收集本院2013年1月至2014年11月入院的88例重症顽固性狼疮肾患者随机分为两组。对照组患者给予环磷酰胺治疗,实验组患者加来氟米特治疗,比较两组患者病情总体缓解情况、治疗前后生化指标与SLEDAI评分、免疫指标等。结果实验组患者总体缓解率(90.91%)显著优于对照组(72.73%),两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.01);实验组患者治疗后尿蛋白[(0.45±0.27)g/24h]、BUN[(6.47±1.23)mmol/L]、Cr[(78.31±7.75)μmol/L]与SLEDAI评分(3.06±0.54)显著低于对照组,Hh[(106.01±10.86)g/L]与[ALB(38.95±3.86)g/L]显著高于对照组,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.01);实验组患者治疗后抗dsDNA阳性、ANA滴度与IgG水平组间比较显著低于对照组,c3、c4水平高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论来氟米特联合环磷酰胺冲击治疗对重症顽固性狼疮肾患者的疗效显著,具有借鉴性。Objective To investigate the efficacy of leflunomide combined with cyclophosphamide pulse therapy for severe refractory lupus nephritis. Methods 88 cases of severe refractory lupus nephritis admitted in our hospital from January 2013 to November 2014 were randomly divided into two groups. Control group was treated with cyclophosphamide, and experimental group was treated with leflunomide on the basis of control group. Compared overall relief of patients' condition, biochemical indices, SLEDAI score, and immune indicators before and after treatment. Results The overall relief rate of experimental group was significantly higher than that of control group (90.91% vs.72.73%), with statistically significant difference between two groups (P〈0.01). Urinary protein [(0.45±0.27) g/24 hi, BUN [(6.47±1.23) mmol/L], Cr [(78.31±7.75)μmol/L] and SLEDAI score [(3.06±0.54)] of experimental group after treatment were significantly lower than those of control group, Hb [(106.01±10.86) g/L] and ALB [(38.95±3.86) g/L] were significantly higher than those of control group, with statistically significant differences between two groups (P〈0.01). Anti-dsDNA positive, ANA titer, and IgG level of experimental group after treatment were significant lower than those of control group, C3 and C4 levels were significantly higher than those of control group, with statistically significant differences between two groups (P〈0.01). Conclusion The efficacy of leflunomide combined with cyclophosphamide pulse therapy for severe refractory lupus nephritis patients is significant, with reference.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229