知识产权损害赔偿问题探讨——以实证分析为视角  

Some Ref lections on Damage Calculation in Intellectual Property Cases:Based on Empirical Analysis

作　　者：宋健[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏省高级人民法院知识产权庭

出　　处：《知识产权》2016年第5期10-19,共10页Intellectual Property

摘　　要：当前关于知识产权案件损害赔偿额高与低的争论,通过相关数据进行实证分析得出的结论,更具有客观性与事实说服力,有助于就提高司法保护力度精准发力。法定赔偿具有解决损害赔偿计算难的优越性,并非司法判赔数额较低的制度性原因。权利人主张较高赔偿额应当加强举证,而司法亦应当避免举证与判赔之间的恶性循环。假定许可费以及研发费用可以作为确定赔偿额的合理参照。合理律师费的判赔应当体现"优质优价"。Compared with other perspectives regarding calculating of damages in IP cases, conclusions reached from empirical analysis which is composed of a mass of data are more objective and persuasive; thereby provide a more solid base for moving judicial protection up a notch. Statutory damages are superior in addressing the problem of ambiguity in determining the amount of damages. However, it is often accused of the institutional reason of the small amount of damages in judicial practice. Where the right holders claim higher amount, they shall bear greater burden of proof. Meanwhile, courts shall avoid vicious circle between evidencing and ruling damages. Assuming license fee and RD fee can be referenced in determining the amount of damages. Ruling of reasonable attorney＇s fees shall correspond with the principle of ＂higher service quality, higher attorney＇s fee＂.

关 键 词：知识产权 损害赔偿 实证分析 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]