17—18世纪中日陆海观念研究——以中日两部兵书《武备志》和《海国兵谈》为例  

Continental National Cognition and Marine National Consciousness from 1621to 1786:A Comparative Study of Chinese Military and Japanese Military Contents of Two Military Annals

作　　者：赵凤翔[1] 关增建[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学科学史与科学文化研究院,上海200240

出　　处：《上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第3期72-83,共12页Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：在1621—1783年这一历史时期当中,庞大的明清帝国与德川幕府统治下的日本,日益走向了陆国与海国两条不同的发展道路。为躲避来自海洋的入侵,明清帝国统治者依托庞大的帝国版图和自给自足的小农经济模式,走上了闭关锁国之路;而相对孱弱的日本,则从德川幕府建立的锁国体制之下,逐渐酝酿出海防和海外扩张思想。茅元仪的《武备志》和被作者林子平称作日本武备志的《海国兵谈》,恰能够反映出中日之间的这种思想分歧对两国武备产生的影响,这些影响表现在二者对海防与边防的认知差异、对西洋火器的不同态度、对海贼与海寇的认识深度以及二者富国强兵之策的差别等诸多方面。From 1621 to 1783, the Ming and the Qing Empires and Japan under the rule of the Tokugawa shogunate, increasingly developed towards two different directions, a continental country and a maritime country. In order to avoid the invasion from the sea, the Ming and the Qing imperial rulers relied on a huge empire, and self-sufficient peasant economy, and embarked on the road of seclusion, while Japan, which is under a lock-state system and is relatively weak, departed from the lock-state system established by Tokugawa shogunate, and gradually brewed coast defense and overseas expansion ideas. The two books, Mao Yuanyi＇s ＂Wu Bei Zhi written by Mao Yuan-yi and Hai Guo Bing Tan by Lin Zi-ping, just reflected the impact of this ideological differences between China and Japan on military, which affected the performance in the cognitive differences of coastal defence and border defence, the different attitudes of Western firearms, the awareness of pirates sea invaders, and the policy to make the nation prosperous and military powerful.

关 键 词：武备志 海国兵谈 陆国 海国 

分 类 号：E89[军事]